CMP 170HX vs RTX 3080
Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.
CMP 170HX16 sourced runs · best 255.9 tok/s
RTX 30809 verified runs · best 277.8 tok/s
Specs and evidence
| CMP 170HX | RTX 3080 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 64 GB | 10 GB |
| Sourced runs on the board | 16 | 9 |
| Models measured | 11 | 9 |
| Best output tok/s | 255.9 tok/s | 277.8 tok/s |
| Highest measured peak VRAM | 58.7 GB | 9.7 GB |
| Street price (latest snapshot) | — | — |
Head-to-head
On the 3 models measured on both cards, CMP 170HX leads on 2, RTX 3080 on 1. The widest gap is on Qwen3.8-27B: CMP 170HX 255.9 tok/s vs RTX 3080 44.4 tok/s (CMP 170HX 476% faster).
The measured matrix
| Model | CMP 170HX | RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| LFM2.5-8B-A1B | — | 277.8 |
| Qwen3.8-27B | 255.9 | 44.4 |
| NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B | 165.1 | — |
| Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | 87.2 | — |
| Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | 87.1 | 64.4 |
| Ornith-1.5-9B | 61.5 | 82.8 |
| Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored | — | 74.1 |
| Bonsai-27B | — | 72.9 |
| gemma-4-12B-it-qat | — | 71.2 |
| gpt-oss-20b | — | 57.1 |
| Qwen3.8-27B-MTP | 46.4 | — |
| Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 46.1 | — |
| Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | 44.5 | — |
| gemma-4-31B-it | 28.3 | — |
| granite-4.2-30b | 23.7 | — |
| Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 20.1 | — |
| Muse-Glimmer-30B | — | 6.0 |