DiggTop ⌕

CMP 170HX vs Tesla V100 x2

Pick a different pair →

Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.

CMP 170HX16 sourced runs · best 255.9 tok/s
Tesla V100 x25 verified runs · best 96.1 tok/s

Specs and evidence

CMP 170HXTesla V100 x2
VRAM64 GB32 GB
Sourced runs on the board165
Models measured113
Best output tok/s255.9 tok/s96.1 tok/s
Highest measured peak VRAM58.7 GB25.2 GB
Street price (latest snapshot)——

Sourced rows only. Peak VRAM is recorded by the person who ran the benchmark, so it is a floor for what the card can hold, not a specification. Price snapshots.

Head-to-head

On the 3 models measured on both cards, CMP 170HX leads on 2, Tesla V100 x2 on 1. The widest gap is on Qwen3.8-27B: CMP 170HX 255.9 tok/s vs Tesla V100 x2 24.0 tok/s (CMP 170HX 966% faster).

The measured matrix

ModelCMP 170HXTesla V100 x2
Qwen3.8-27B255.9 W4A1624.0 Q8_K_XL
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B165.1 Q8_0—
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next46.1 UD-IQ1_S96.1 IQ3XXS
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B87.2 UD-Q8_K_XL—
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B87.1 Q8_065.0 Q4_K_M
Ornith-1.5-9B61.5 BF16—
Qwen3.8-27B-MTP46.4 INT8-W8A16—
Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct44.5 UD-Q3_K_XL—
gemma-4-31B-it28.3 NVFP4—
granite-4.2-30b23.7 Q8_0—
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct20.1 NVFP4—

Head-to-head (models tested on both): CMP 170HX 2 · Tesla V100 x2 1 · tied 0 · data as of Oct 30, 2026. Full rules: methodology.

Related reading: RTX 5090 vs 3090 · quantization · Value index · Full board

↑