DiggTop ⌕

CMP 170HX vs Tesla V100 x4

Pick a different pair →

Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.

CMP 170HX16 sourced runs · best 255.9 tok/s
Tesla V100 x41 verified run · best 391.0 tok/s

Specs and evidence

CMP 170HXTesla V100 x4
VRAM64 GB16 GB
Sourced runs on the board161
Models measured111
Best output tok/s255.9 tok/s391.0 tok/s
Highest measured peak VRAM58.7 GB61.0 GB
Street price (latest snapshot)——

Sourced rows only. Peak VRAM is recorded by the person who ran the benchmark, so it is a floor for what the card can hold, not a specification. Price snapshots.

Head-to-head

Only one model has been measured on both cards (Qwen3.8-27B). On that single data point CMP 170HX records 255.9 tok/s and Tesla V100 x4 records 391.0 tok/s — treat it as one data point, not a ranking.

The measured matrix

ModelCMP 170HXTesla V100 x4
Qwen3.8-27B255.9 W4A16391.0 NVFP4
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B165.1 Q8_0—
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B87.2 UD-Q8_K_XL—
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B87.1 Q8_0—
Ornith-1.5-9B61.5 BF16—
Qwen3.8-27B-MTP46.4 INT8-W8A16—
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next46.1 UD-IQ1_S—
Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct44.5 UD-Q3_K_XL—
gemma-4-31B-it28.3 NVFP4—
granite-4.2-30b23.7 Q8_0—
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct20.1 NVFP4—

Head-to-head (models tested on both): CMP 170HX 0 · Tesla V100 x4 1 · tied 0 · data as of Oct 30, 2026. Full rules: methodology.

Related reading: RTX 5090 vs 3090 · quantization · Value index · Full board

↑