Intel Arc Pro B70 vs RTX 5070
Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.
Intel Arc Pro B7018 sourced runs · best 283.1 tok/s
RTX 50705 verified runs · best 185.8 tok/s
Specs and evidence
| Intel Arc Pro B70 | RTX 5070 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32 GB | 12 GB |
| Sourced runs on the board | 18 | 5 |
| Models measured | 16 | 5 |
| Best output tok/s | 283.1 tok/s | 185.8 tok/s |
| Highest measured peak VRAM | 23.2 GB | 9.0 GB |
| Street price (latest snapshot) | $1,300 | — |
Head-to-head
On the 3 models measured on both cards, Intel Arc Pro B70 leads on 0, RTX 5070 on 3. The widest gap is on Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: Intel Arc Pro B70 24.0 tok/s vs RTX 5070 81.8 tok/s (RTX 5070 241% faster).
The measured matrix
| Model | Intel Arc Pro B70 | RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| Laguna-XS-2.1 | 283.1 | — |
| Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | 248.3 | — |
| Ornith-1.0-35B-B70-Turbo | 224.9 | — |
| Nex-N2-mini-B70-Turbo | 224.3 | — |
| SIQ-1-35B-B70-Turbo | 223.7 | — |
| Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-B70-Turbo | 209.0 | — |
| NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B | 186.6 | — |
| NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B | — | 185.8 |
| Apodex-1.1-mini | — | 182.3 |
| LFM2.5-2.6B | 132.4 | — |
| Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | 131.5 | — |
| Ornith-1.5-9B | 49.6 | 102.0 |
| Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 24.0 | 81.8 |
| Gemma4-26B-A4B-QAT-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Balanced-MTP | 58.4 | — |
| Qwen3.8-27B | 27.8 | 48.3 |
| Qwen3.6-27B-MTP | 36.0 | — |
| Muse-Glimmer-30B | 29.2 | — |
| ThinkingCap-Qwen3.6-27B | 27.9 | — |