Radeon AI Pro R9700 vs RTX 5070 12GB + RTX 5060 Ti 16GB x2
Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.
Radeon AI Pro R970014 sourced runs · best 969.4 tok/s
RTX 5070 12GB + RTX 5060 Ti 16GB x21 verified run · best 66.0 tok/s
Specs and evidence
| Radeon AI Pro R9700 | RTX 5070 12GB + RTX 5060 Ti 16GB x2 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32 GB | 12 GB |
| Sourced runs on the board | 14 | 1 |
| Models measured | 14 | 1 |
| Best output tok/s | 969.4 tok/s | 66.0 tok/s |
| Highest measured peak VRAM | 92.2 GB | — |
| Street price (latest snapshot) | — | — |
Head-to-head
Only one model has been measured on both cards (Qwen3.8-Flash-Next). On that single data point Radeon AI Pro R9700 records 25.6 tok/s and RTX 5070 12GB + RTX 5060 Ti 16GB x2 records 66.0 tok/s — treat it as one data point, not a ranking.
The measured matrix
| Model | Radeon AI Pro R9700 | RTX 5070 12GB + RTX 5060 Ti 16GB x2 |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | 969.4 | — |
| Qwen3.5-0.8B | 554.5 | — |
| LFM2.5-230M | 520.0 | — |
| LFM2.5-350M | 466.0 | — |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 286.6 | — |
| LFM2.5-8B-A1B | 241.1 | — |
| gemma-4-E2B-it | 169.7 | — |
| gemma-4-E4B-it | 137.0 | — |
| Muse-Glimmer-30B | 134.6 | — |
| Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 25.6 | 66.0 |
| Qwen3.8-27B | 64.3 | — |
| DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | 59.4 | — |
| Qwen 3.8 Flash-Next Base | 57.0 | — |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 17.4 | — |