RTX 3090 vs RTX 3090 x2
Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.
RTX 309018 sourced runs · best 709.5 tok/s
RTX 3090 x28 verified runs · best 240.8 tok/s
Specs and evidence
| RTX 3090 | RTX 3090 x2 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Sourced runs on the board | 18 | 8 |
| Models measured | 11 | 7 |
| Best output tok/s | 709.5 tok/s | 240.8 tok/s |
| Highest measured peak VRAM | 22.0 GB | 42.9 GB |
| Street price (latest snapshot) | $1,720 | — |
Head-to-head
On the 3 models measured on both cards, RTX 3090 leads on 1, RTX 3090 x2 on 2. The widest gap is on NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B: RTX 3090 353.7 tok/s vs RTX 3090 x2 197.0 tok/s (RTX 3090 80% faster).
The measured matrix
| Model | RTX 3090 | RTX 3090 x2 |
|---|---|---|
| LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct | 709.5 | — |
| Qwen3.5-0.8B-MTP | 476.1 | — |
| NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B | 353.7 | 197.0 |
| LFM2.5-2.6B | 305.6 | — |
| Qwen3.6-27B | — | 240.8 |
| Qwen3.5-4B-MTP | 240.4 | — |
| Qwen3.8-27B | 164.6 | 219.8 |
| MiniCPM-V 4.7-35B-A3B | — | 172.2 |
| Qwen3.5-9B-MTP | 164.3 | — |
| Nanbeige4.3-33B | — | 66.2 |
| Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-REAP-256-duo | — | 53.5 |
| Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 38.6 | 40.1 |
| Ornstein3.6-27B-MTP-NSC-ACE-SABER | 32.9 | — |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 28.1 | — |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | 26.0 | — |